The Lion's Dream - Tales of Ted Kennedy's America

Title Post
The Lion's Dream - Tales of Ted Kennedy's America

Senator_Edward_Kennedy_1979_roll.jpg

The office of the presidency was one that few men desired, including the current occupant of the office. His mother told Teddy to never run, something he'd promised her faithfully that he'd never do. Both knew what the pursuit of power had done to the family. Ever since the patriarch Joe Sr. saw his career fall apart with a few unfortunate words, he pushed Jack and Bobby to go for the top job, only to see them publically murdered before his ultimate passing. By 1969, his brothers and father were gone. There was no family left to push Ted to seek the presidency, even after everyone from Mayor Daley to the hippies had pulled the strings for a last-minute bid in 1968. Freed from the pressures of higher office and in grieving, he fell into a pattern of drinking and partying.

The scandal that forever haunted Ted Kennedy was proof of the great expectations that surrounded the heir to the throne. The death of a young woman was less of a concern to the men on Martha's Vineyard than what it meant for the survival of American liberalism. The public relations disaster that erupted was only mitigated by JFK's dream of a moon landing coming to fruition. This was a brief moment of joy for a nation that had been grieving ever since Dallas 1963. A reminder of what the nation had once been, and what it was struggling to retain.

The question of why Ted Kennedy eventually made a run was harder to determine. When asked in a CBS interview with Roger Mudd, he succinctly responded by saying it was to continue with what his brothers left off. The soundbite was replayed enough to become the dominating theme of his campaign, yet few remember today that the remainder of his response was rambling.

It did not make sense that Kennedy kept staring at the White House when he could have taken his hundreds of millions of dollars and enjoyed a pleasant retirement. But as one of the most powerful senators the nation had ever seen, he was front and center in a battle between a Democratic Congress and a Democratic president that each saw themselves as responsible for their party's victory in 1976. As much as Kennedy was afraid of becoming president, he realized what the office meant, and Carter was using it wrong. He knew what the stakes were. Upon announcing his candidacy, he wrote a series of letters telling his family that he loved them in the event he was ever assassinated. That fear overwhelmed him. Many speculate that Kennedy suffered from some form of PTSD due to his difficulties talking about his brothers. Upon making a speech honoring his brother's creation of the Peace Corps, he walked off and hid his pain and sorrow on his face with his increasingly tremored hands.

It was the fight over one central issue that made it clear why Teddy wasn't satisfied letting matters rest with Jimmy Carter. Not only was national health insurance the extension of what was left off in the New Deal, but it was also a reflection of what the Kennedy family's wealth could not buy them - immortality. He had seen his brother crippled by Addison's disease while his sister was permanently incapacitated by a lobotomy. The president himself struggled to stand up unaided for extended periods on account of his 1964 plane crash. His hands had a violent tremor on account of an unrevealed inherited medical condition. His drinking exploded on account of difficulties with his wife or his several mistresses.

By all accounts, the six-year-itch was in danger of extending into a seven-year one. After a disappointing midterm election, Kennedy had fell victim to a scandal that played Cold War tensions against his brothers' will for peace with the Soviet Union. To push Senator Hatfield's effort for a nuclear freeze, Kennedy had secretly negotiated with the ABC board of directors to have Walter Cronkite interview General Secretary Yuri Andropov. Republicans immediately accused the president of colluding with the USSR or whitewashing a former KGB director.

While things might have seemed dim for Kennedy, he took it upon himself to invoke the fighting spirit he kept through his tragedies and shortcomings. This was not an attack on him personally, but an attack on peace and international brotherhood. Kennedy now had to sell to the American public that what he did was worth it to avoid the catastrophes of The Day After. He knew that getting universal approval from the nation would prove impossible, but if he didn't back down, he could rally together a progressive majority.

Perhaps this Republican distraction was a sign of the good times his administration provided. Before the Raul Affair, polls ranked the Beastie Boys as a bigger threat than the USSR. Inflation was a now word out of most people's vocabulary, and there was never another time where people were forced to check if they had an even or odd-numbered license plate.

As Len Bias championed Kennedy's beloved Boston Celtics to victory in the NBA Finals, the idealized Ted Kennedy that the nation loved came back. Over the winter, he had stopped drinking and improved his diet, losing 49 pounds in 50 days. Even his estranged wife Joan, who decided not to divorce Teddy after the thrill of the 1980 campaign, began giving her husband some support. The mythology of Camelot certainly made Ted Kennedy's career the success it was, but he paid the price of being the Kennedy who lived. Now, he was to deliver the last steps of turning Camelot's legacy from mythology to reality.
 
To get a Ted Kennedy presidency, you really need to butterfly away the incident at Chappaquiddick. With that around his neck, someone with a competent a campaign as Reagan had would bury him in a landslide in 1980.
 
Glad to see the excitement for this timeline!

To get a Ted Kennedy presidency, you really need to butterfly away the incident at Chappaquiddick. With that around his neck, someone with a competent a campaign as Reagan had would bury him in a landslide in 1980.
I guess we'll have to see how he pulls it off against Reagan... :)
 
1980 novel Golgotha set in the 1990s -Teddy serving second term after first one in 1980s.
Ooh I have never heard of this! Was familiar with the Jeffrey Archer novel with President Kennedy but I want to hear more about that world. Always interesting to see future history from the past.
 

PNWKing

Banned
What are the following people up to?:
Jeb Bush
Cory Booker
Lee Iacocca
Warren Buffett
Steve Jobs
Leonard Cohen
Natalie Merchant
Dick Wolf
Barack Obama
Andrew Yang
Samuel L. Jackson
Tony Shalhoub
Bitty Schramm
Paul Simon
Art Garfunkel
Chip Taylor
Maddie Blaustein
Ann Curry
Steven Spielberg
William Hanna
Joseph Barbera
Powers Boothe
Tom Snyder
Bette Midler
John Heinz
Orrin Hatch
Ron Paul
Jon Stewart
Lyndon LaRouche
The Coen Brothers
Robin Williams
Al Gore
 
Well, How Did We Get Here? The Progressive Alliance and the 1980 Election
Well, How Did We Get Here? The Progressive Alliance and the 1980 Election

51NSVwGzb0L._SR600%2C315_PIWhiteStrip%2CBottomLeft%2C0%2C35_SCLZZZZZZZ_FMpng_BG255%2C255%2C255.jpg

By 1978, the grand experiment of Jimmy Carter, a man resolved to end the American public's obsession with consumerism, was clearly out of step with the Democratic Party and the nation as a whole. His prudence resulted in bizarre policy decisions, such as backtracking on a $50 tax rebate right after Tip O'Neil had whipped the votes for its passage. Despite running on a staunchly liberal platform in 1976, Carter had no interest from the Washington establishment that had previously dismissed his chances of ever becoming president. Humphrey-Hawkins had been watered down to cease being meaningful, but while the bill's namesake had passed months before it passed, liberalism was not doomed to die with Hubert Humphrey.

The bitterly divided forces of the American center-left now had a common enemy, especially when President Ford had been more willing to compromise on issues such as health care reform. Ever since the death of JFK and RFK, an increasing divide had been drawn between the old-school labor machinery and the social liberation movements. The activist left had their way in 1972, but the union bosses were not willing to disrupt the system of Cold War Keynesianism by endorsing an anti-war candidate. This divide certainly turned McGovern's defeat into a catastrophe.

The UAW, always more willing than the AFL-CIO as a whole to embrace the New Left, began overtures towards the formation of a Progressive Alliance. In an attempt to copy the electoral tactics of the New Right, groups from George Meany's AFL-CIO to Tom Hayden's Campaign for Economic Democracy joined forces in an unthinkable fashion. Socialist author Michael Harrington joined forces with organized labor to form the Democratic Agenda, drawing allies such as AFSCME president Jerry Wurf and Machinist president William Winipsinginer. For the first time in decades, socialism was no longer a dirty word to labor.

By the time of the 1978 midterm convention, the Agenda controlled just short of a majority of delegates. Despite DNC Chair John White's attempts at convention choreography, several delegates staged a walkout during President Carter's speech, focusing instead on Ted Kennedy's health care workshops. When questioned on if he'd support Carter for reelection, UAW President Douglas Fraser doubted if Carter would even run.

The administration was looking increasingly hopeless and hatched a plan to create division between labor and the left. Their plan, devised by lawyer Hillary Rodman, was to force a controversial vote committing a Democratic administration to 3% unemployment. Many were skeptical of this ambitious target, and it appeared likely that the administration would secure a victory on a floor vote. Unfortunately for Carter, the convention chair mistakenly read the name introducing the resolution as Douglas Fraser instead of Rep. Don Fraser. Sensing that the end of the Carter administration was near, Douglas Fraser went along with the mistake and rallying labor behind the resolution.

Organized labor had finally committed itself to use its political power to win concessions in government. They were now in search of an alternative, but their choice was a natural one. With the endorsement of the Democratic Agenda and the Progressive Alliance, Ted Kennedy went on to sweep the 1980 Democratic primaries. His early victory gave the pressure groups a chance to reorient their efforts towards the general election and supporting down-ballot candidates. While Douglas Fraser was a member of Harrington's DSOC, he knew that it would not be feasible to openly ally with a socialist organization. Shortly after Fraser's death in 2008, his longtime goal of uniting socialist activism and organized labor was put into fruition by President Morello. After an uphill climb, a socialist had finally earned his way into the White House. Of course, some of the unions were less pleased with this decision...
 
The Election of 1980
qt8pYgT.jpg

It's the eighties baby! That's right, everyone! Hop in your DeLorean, tune on the Cosby Show, and put on your VW chain because we're getting into the election of Edward M. "Teddy" Kennedy. This election is one of the big "Ws" for liberalism and the Democratic Party, and it's one of the grand ideological battles that shape our political landscape today. If you're new to this channel, we like to give a simple run-down of what happened and turn these complex concepts into normal, human, language. This video would be great if you're an AP Government or taking an intro to poli sci class and you've got a big exam coming up, or if you just are a weirdo that likes learning! It doesn't matter who you are, because we're going to grow your brain right now!

sPy2yNQ.png

Now, this is an unusual election because it was the first time since 1884 that the incumbent president lost renomination on his own party's ticket. While being the incumbent is usually an advantage, it wasn't so much for poor Jimmy Carter. Carter is the former governor of Georgia, a peanut farmer who comes out of nowhere to win the 1976 election, largely due to distrust of the political system after Watergate. Unfortunately for Jimmy, he doesn't live up to a lot of the expectations of the people that voted for him, and he faces a challenge from the great scion of New Deal liberalism, Ted Kennedy.

That's right, Camelot is back! Kennedy really wants to take control of the Democratic Party and redirect it towards the values of his brothers JFK and RFK. Even though a lot of people wanted him to run in the past three elections, he declines, but he decides with an unpopular Democratic president that now is the time to act. Kennedy's main problem with Carter is the president going back on promises for NHI, or national health insurance, which Kennedy was very passionate about. From the moment he runs, it's OVER for poor Jimmy Carter. A lot of people, even his own vice president, Walter Mondale, want Carter to not even run, but he stays in the fight after the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. Other than the midwest, where some of those wheat farmers are rallied by the embargo of Soviet grain, Kennedy has a very easy time. His support base is a combination of both "new politics" progressives, the old school New Deal liberals, and the conservative Democrats just looking for a chance. Jimmy Carter and Jerry Brown, who also ran, really are stuck with the few anti-Keynesian forces in the Democratic Party.

The Republicans are really worried about the fame that Kennedy has, and they go for their biggest star. Ronald Reagan, the former actor and former governor of California, narrowly loses in 1976 and is ready to fight for the presidency again. He is really seen as the leader of the right-wing of the Republican Party but faces some resistance from the establishment. Reagan is really caught in a difficult position because if he moves too far to the right, he loses support to someone like George Bush, and if he moves too far to the center, he loses support to John Connally. Despite this, Reagan is really able to build from 1976 and is able to put the conservatives on top, but at the coast of moderating his message a little bit. There aren't any major third-party candidates in this election, though a moderate Republican named John Anderson thinks about running as an independent before dropping out and endorsing the Democratic ticket.

moZ6dnu.jpg

Now if we look at the big electoral map, Kennedy just knocks it out of the park! He gets everything east of the Mississippi (north and south) and even takes Reagan's home state of California. The Republicans are just left with this rump western conservative region. Now, you might be wondering, how does this happen? Well, the big issue is the economy, stupid! Inflation is up, unemployment is up, and there's an oil crisis. Carter is really the first president since Herbert Hoover to divert from Keynesian orthodoxy, which means that instead of increasing spending during a recession, he cuts it. Kennedy is able to say that was a big no-no! He argues that if cutting spending didn't work with Carter, cutting it to an extreme degree under Reagan won't work.

Now, even though Teddy is a larger-than-life figure, the country recognizes he's not a saint. There was a horrible accident in 1969 that resulted in the death of a young woman called the Chappaquiddick incident. Reagan and the RNC agree not to run on Kennedy's moral failings, but the Religious Right and direct-mail conservatives really go dirty in the campaign. Reagan is later forced to even disavow these attacks, which angers his most passionate supporters in the religious right.

eTiXPRY.jpg

This election had one of the most important debates in American history as well. Kennedy is just going on the attack against Reagan, talking about "crocodile tears for our economic distress!" Reagan is really forced to backtrack a lot of his controversial statements comparing the New Deal to fascism and arguing that Social Security was communism. There's also a big fear of nuclear war if Reagan gets elected, especially given the situation in Afghanistan. But while Kennedy really goes on the attack, he's able to connect it back to a message of hope. He argues for NHI, a price freeze to combat inflation, and renewable energy, all policies that were once seen as staunchly liberal but turned mainstream after this election.

One last reason for Kennedy's victory is his mass mobilization of different groups. He's not only running on the traditional New Deal Coalition, but he's even able to rally Hispanic and Native American voters. That's why we see Alaska going Democratic for one of the few times in history. Women also are very organized in 1980. Kennedy is a huge supporter of the Equal Rights Amendment and picks Lindy Boggs of Louisana as the first female vice president.

Overall, the big takeaway is that the 1980 election is the return to Keynesian, tax and spend, liberal orthodoxy. It is the rally of progressive forces formed by Franklin Roosevelt in 1932 with the New Deal. Alright, everyone in TV land, that about wraps it up for today's episode. We just got one of the big ones done with! Make sure to like and subscribe to this channel, and as always, where attention goes, energy flows.

---


3bmFV1x.png
ECRoafE.png

4H1mSb5.png
 
What are the following people up to?:
Jeb Bush
Cory Booker
Lee Iacocca
Warren Buffett
Steve Jobs
Leonard Cohen
Natalie Merchant
Dick Wolf
Barack Obama
Andrew Yang
Samuel L. Jackson
Tony Shalhoub
Bitty Schramm
Paul Simon
Art Garfunkel
Chip Taylor
Maddie Blaustein
Ann Curry
Steven Spielberg
William Hanna
Joseph Barbera
Powers Boothe
Tom Snyder
Bette Midler
John Heinz
Orrin Hatch
Ron Paul
Jon Stewart
Lyndon LaRouche
The Coen Brothers
Robin Williams
Al Gore
Literally, the timeline has only progressed through November 1980, with the only changes being political. Why on earth would any of these people's careers be any different from OTL so early on? Why do you keep doing this? It's very taxing on a writer to have to answer these kind of questions. I know this because you did this in my timeline too.
 
Firing Line with William F. Buckley
2b1ba3c9-30cb-490d-97cb-7be552ca02d5.jpg


🎵 Brandenburg Concerto No.2 in F Major, Third Movement (Allegro Assai) plays 🎵
BUCKLEY: Good evening. Four years ago, we concluded at the end of a fairly close and extensive campaign season that not much had changed. Both the Democratic and Republican parties had chosen to nominate moderates to the great dismay of their more ideologically orientated bases. The contradictions of those bases seem to have been torn apart over the course of this grand battle between the unabashed liberalism of Senator Kennedy and the unabashed conservatism of Governor Reagan. The voters, of course, have made their decision and must rest with its consequences for the next four years.

With me tonight are two guests who are as ideologically varied as the two candidates they supported. Michael Harrington is the author of The Other America and the leader of the Democratic Socialist Organizing Committee. His organization supported Senator Kennedy in his campaign for the Democratic nomination. Patrick J. Buchanan is an editorial columnist, the former special assistant to President Nixon, and a notable supporter of Governor Connally over Reagan in the 1980 presidential primaries.

It seems to me, gentlemen, that the general theme of this election was the same as the last one. Governor Reagan argued that inflation is the larger long-term woe to our nation, while Senator Kennedy felt unemployment was the greater concern. Why has the public drawn themselves towards the short-term solution of jobs without considering inflation?

HARRINGTON: Because unemployment is a much more obvious issue. If you have no income, how are you supposed to supply for yourself?

BUCKLEY: But unemployment, even in times as unfortunate as these, is something that does not impact quite as many people. It is, relatively speaking, a largely unpainful experience. There is enough of a social safety net, as you yourself would know, that it isn't an urgent concern.

HARRINGTON: Perhaps you view things that way because of your limited interactions with poverty and unemployment-

BUCKLEY: You've already won the election, you don't need to do a victory lap right now.

HARINGTON: Well, it wasn't me that one the election, wasn't it? Senator Kennedy now has a responsibility to deliver on the promise of Humphrey-Hawkins and end these vicious cycles our communities are falling into.

BUCHANAN: You can offer as many government job programs cleaning up trash on the highways as possible, but that just doesn't cut the mustard. We can't put all of our trust into big government or private enterprise when their interests are contradictory to those of the nation. Reagan didn't have an answer for outsourcing. He didn't have something that would bring back the pride of a factory worker who sees everyone trading in their American Chevrolets for Japanese Toyotas.

BUCKLEY: Well, in the case of the automobile industry, they have been heavily burdened by the unions, whose interests are not in running things more efficiently but in keeping their positions.

HARRINGTON: Well we can talk about outsourcing or union inefficiency as separate issues, but they are connected. The first outsourcing that has gone on is outsourcing from unionized states to ununionized states. Part of why we saw such a shocking amount of support for President-Elect Kennedy in the Southern and Western states was this discontent with their labor being the most exploited in the country. When Reagan is saying that unemployment is caused by your minimum wage being too high, that's not a very convincing argument.

BUCHANAN: That is to me, the error of the Reagan campaign. It's hard to tell the voters that they deserve to paid less money. The realities are that our current job market cannot support this implosion of new workers. In the past decade, the percentage of women in the workplace has gone up by 10%. Women should be entitled to avoid competition in the rat race and raise their families. If it's not the mother's job anymore, whose job is it?

BUCKLEY: I think Mr. Buchanan, being educated by Jesuits, has been reading the socialistic aspects of Rerum Novarum a bit too closely with his comments on private enterprise. For a conservative, you seem to have awfully little faith in the market.

BUCHANAN: I'm not anti-free market, and I certainly am not part of the Dorothy Day anarchist tribe of Mr. Harrington. I believe in supply-side economics as much as you do. I just like to see the American people profiting off of what does not belong to the state. I believed in Kemp-Roth as the only counterweight we Republicans have to the Santa Claus promises of Humphrey-Hawkins. It is just a shame that Reagan never embraced or even defended it when he was facing a hoard of slanders from Kennedy.

BUCKLEY: I am in no disagreement with you when it comes to my disappointment at Reagan's triangulation on that particular issue. I am, however, staunchly opposed to the Republicans bringing out the same dark forces of populism that Senator Kennedy has reintroduced into the mainstream. The words that came from his mouth could easily have been pulled from the mouth of Father Coughlin.

BUCHANAN: A man unfairly slandered-

HARRINGTON: Populism is by no means a dark force. At its essence, it is extending rights to those who don't have them. Comparing the liberalism of Ted Kennedy to a fascist like Father Coughlin is not an observation made in reality.

BUCKLEY: Well, Joe Sr. happened to be quite fond of the radio priest. They both seem to be men who blamed Wall Street for any of the countries woes, and they certainly are disinterested in fighting for democracy.

HARRINGTON: If you think that extracting every bit of resource from Latin America is fighting for democracy I suppose I'm anti-democratic, but-

BUCKLEY: I must apologize, Mr. Harrington, but we have to take a break here. We will return to this discussion briefly.
 
Last edited:
qt8pYgT.jpg

It's the eighties baby! That's right, everyone! Hop in your DeLorean, tune on the Cosby Show, and put on your VW chain because we're getting into the election of Edward M. "Teddy" Kennedy. This election is one of the big "Ws" for liberalism and the Democratic Party, and it's one of the grand ideological battles that shape our political landscape today. If you're new to this channel, we like to give a simple run-down of what happened and turn these complex concepts into normal, human, language. This video would be great if you're an AP Government or taking an intro to poli sci class and you've got a big exam coming up, or if you just are a weirdo that likes learning! It doesn't matter who you are, because we're going to grow your brain right now!

sPy2yNQ.png

Now, this is an unusual election because it was the first time since 1884 that the incumbent president lost renomination on his own party's ticket. While being the incumbent is usually an advantage, it wasn't so much for poor Jimmy Carter. Carter is the former governor of Georgia, a peanut farmer who comes out of nowhere to win the 1976 election, largely due to distrust of the political system after Watergate. Unfortunately for Jimmy, he doesn't live up to a lot of the expectations of the people that voted for him, and he faces a challenge from the great scion of New Deal liberalism, Ted Kennedy.

That's right, Camelot is back! Kennedy really wants to take control of the Democratic Party and redirect it towards the values of his brothers JFK and RFK. Even though a lot of people wanted him to run in the past three elections, he declines, but he decides with an unpopular Democratic president that now is the time to act. Kennedy's main problem with Carter is the president going back on promises for NHI, or national health insurance, which Kennedy was very passionate about. From the moment he runs, it's OVER for poor Jimmy Carter. A lot of people, even his own vice president, Walter Mondale, want Carter to not even run, but he stays in the fight after the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. Other than the midwest, where some of those wheat farmers are rallied by the embargo of Soviet grain, Kennedy has a very easy time. His support base is a combination of both "new politics" progressives, the old school New Deal liberals, and the conservative Democrats just looking for a chance. Jimmy Carter and Jerry Brown, who also ran, really are stuck with the few anti-Keynesian forces in the Democratic Party.

The Republicans are really worried about the fame that Kennedy has, and they go for their biggest star. Ronald Reagan, the former actor and former governor of California, narrowly loses in 1976 and is ready to fight for the presidency again. He is really seen as the leader of the right-wing of the Republican Party but faces some resistance from the establishment. Reagan is really caught in a difficult position because if he moves too far to the right, he loses support to someone like George Bush, and if he moves too far to the center, he loses support to John Connally. Despite this, Reagan is really able to build from 1976 and is able to put the conservatives on top, but at the coast of moderating his message a little bit. There aren't any major third-party candidates in this election, though a moderate Republican named John Anderson thinks about running as an independent before dropping out and endorsing the Democratic ticket.

moZ6dnu.jpg

Now if we look at the big electoral map, Kennedy just knocks it out of the park! He gets everything east of the Mississippi (north and south) and even takes Reagan's home state of California. The Republicans are just left with this rump western conservative region. Now, you might be wondering, how does this happen? Well, the big issue is the economy, stupid! Inflation is up, unemployment is up, and there's an oil crisis. Carter is really the first president since Herbert Hoover to divert from Keynesian orthodoxy, which means that instead of increasing spending during a recession, he cuts it. Kennedy is able to say that was a big no-no! He argues that if cutting spending didn't work with Carter, cutting it to an extreme degree under Reagan won't work.

Now, even though Teddy is a larger-than-life figure, the country recognizes he's not a saint. There was a horrible accident in 1969 that resulted in the death of a young woman called the Chappaquiddick incident. Reagan and the RNC agree not to run on Kennedy's moral failings, but the Religious Right and direct-mail conservatives really go dirty in the campaign. Reagan is later forced to even disavow these attacks, which angers his most passionate supporters in the religious right.

eTiXPRY.jpg

This election had one of the most important debates in American history as well. Kennedy is just going on the attack against Reagan, talking about "crocodile tears for our economic distress!" Reagan is really forced to backtrack a lot of his controversial statements comparing the New Deal to fascism and arguing that Social Security was communism. There's also a big fear of nuclear war if Reagan gets elected, especially given the situation in Afghanistan. But while Kennedy really goes on the attack, he's able to connect it back to a message of hope. He argues for NHI, a price freeze to combat inflation, and renewable energy, all policies that were once seen as staunchly liberal but turned mainstream after this election.

One last reason for Kennedy's victory is his mass mobilization of different groups. He's not only running on the traditional New Deal Coalition, but he's even able to rally Hispanic and Native American voters. That's why we see Alaska going Democratic for one of the few times in history. Women also are very organized in 1980. Kennedy is a huge supporter of the Equal Rights Amendment and picks Lindy Boggs of Louisana as the first female vice president.

Overall, the big takeaway is that the 1980 election is the return to Keynesian, tax and spend, liberal orthodoxy. It is the rally of progressive forces formed by Franklin Roosevelt in 1932 with the New Deal. Alright, everyone in TV land, that about wraps it up for today's episode. We just got one of the big ones done with! Make sure to like and subscribe to this channel, and as always, where attention goes, energy flows.

---


3bmFV1x.png
ECRoafE.png

4H1mSb5.png

It seems that the Iran Hostage Crisis was butterflied away somehow. This would make sense if you want a Kennedy victory in 1980.
 
Shortly after Fraser's death in 2008, his longtime goal of uniting socialist activism and organized labor was put into fruition by President Morello.​
That last name sounds familiar…

Anyways, very intrigued and hooked into this timeline. I have a soft spot for Bobby/Ted Kennedy becomes president TL’s, and I’m looking forward to see how this unfolds.
 
Matt Christman on the 2020 election
AT-cm%7C1012296215-preview-480x272.jpg

Just waiting for some more people to pop in. So I've finally figured out why my streams have been cutting out, and it's because I haven't upgraded to the premium service on Broadcaster. I always thought that these were treated as a utility, but it turns out that's not true. There is an option, of course, to have ad breaks every so often. I don't think that's a good idea for this format because it's based on a stream of consciousness and I don't want to interrupt that. Maybe you guys can just put something in the chat at the 28-minute mark so I can wrap things up.

Well, I know everyone was glued to the TV to see whether we'd have a voteball tonight, whether this would be the permanent realignment for American liberal-progressivism. And well, not only was it not a landslide but Falwell was able to make this race closer than in 2016. I mean, think about that. The nuttiest nominee in the GOP's history, someone certainly to the right of Goldwater and Reagan, made this the first properly close election in over four decades. Says something about our country.

Let's think back to 2016. You've got this guy Randy Altschuler, this supposedly wonderful New York Senator, a tech millionaire, a young, moderate candidate. And he eats shit! Now, we've got this trailer park boy preacher who is the only man to seriously threaten the Kennedys since Oswald etched their names into history forever. This man got away with not only being a sex freak but a cuckold fetishist! And the Republicans still turned out for him! And the best part is, he doesn't need to win! He didn't even want to do that!

That's the problem with John-John, he's too reformed! He's repressing the Irishman within him. We loved when Teddy showed up widely drunk to press conferences! We loved how he could barely stand up! We loved how if he was dangling off a cliff, he'd rather swat Joan's hand away than be rescued.

John John used to be like that, but something went into him that he had to be president! He just got lucky enough that Morello had to hold the office during the difficult parts. People talk about there being a "Kennedy curse" but it's really a "Kennedy gift." If he didn't nearly perish in that plane crash in 2007, he would have been elected in '08 and not known what to do during the recession. It's the same with Teddy - if Chappaquidick was avoided and he ran in 1972 or 1976, he'd face the same shit that doomed Skippy.

This election was really between the Catholic royal family and the Protestant Pope. Two sides of the American experience. The Kennedys, being Irish Catholics, know that they have sinned and need to redeem themselves in God's eyes through public service. The Falwells, on the other hand, see God materialized in money! Is either going to stop sinning? Of course not! They both got their desired outcome in this election. The Kennedys get to show their gentleness with power and the Falwells will bring more losers to their sicko university.

Did anyone on the East Coast actually stay up past the mandatory election silence? I know I did in 2016, but we were all nerds back then. This election was never a serious question. I stand by that even when presented with how close this was. There was no way for Falwell to win. What it really represents is the drip-drip-drip in terms of the collapse of the New Deal hegemony. The question was always whether 2024 was going to be just another drip or the floor giving out, and I think we know which way things are going after seeing this result.

The Republicans have tried to do this by exalting all of their bases of support. They tried going for traditional finance capital, but even if the WASP CIA guys were responsible for the deaths of millions of Indonesians and had fucking heart attack guns, they were seen as boring men in suits. There's a reason why all of the intelligence dramas have Israeli commandos or Navy SEALs now. Otherwise, you'll end up like Matt Damon's character in The Good Shephard and get asked if you're too much of a wimp to become president. That dream died out when Nelson Rockefeller and George Bush failed miserably.

Then the Southern Protestants start asserting themselves once that damn Catholic took away that good ol' boy Skippy's rightful job. From there, we get the Pat Robertson campaign in 1988 and people like Falwell, Ralph Reed, and Mike Huckabee in political office. But however devoted the Religious Right is, they will never be accepted by the general public, so the evangelicals have to start presenting themselves as businessmen. That puts them at direct odds with the businessmen of the 1968 revolution who formed the tech industry. So you've got three competing forms of business fighting for control, and none of them are happy with the others stacking up their cash. They may all be capitalists, but culturally they are at complete odds with each other!

The WASP set sail to America, or rather sent their servants out to America, in search of a land with no rules. As a result, they built up a nation into this great power. Then, they discovered that in a system of conquer or be conquered, they'd lose their fortunes and their empire if they got unlucky. So they made rules to protect the existence of capitalism by grounding it. Because of that, the WASP loses the joy of it all and hands over power to the Catholics and the Jews while they sit back and enjoy their inheritances waiting to die.

There are too many rules in this world of capitalism for anyone to enjoy entering it. That's why the boardrooms are full of boring technocrats these days, amongst both the elected and appointed members. There are only a few mediums that regulation and scrutiny escaped, and these are the opium of our modern masses. The internet, recreational drugs, and religion are the only outlets the wanna-be Rockefellers and Carnegies have!

You know how Tito had a Slovene mother and Croat father? There's got to be someone like that who just has every element of the balkanized conservative movement in them. They'll need to have gone to the Red Sea or Jerusalem to be baptized in some weird form of Protestantism and sell a pair of underwear that uploads your ball temperature to the internet. All the while they've come from a family that has been in the Freemasons since the 1700s. Does that mythical politician exist? Probably! If not, we'll have to wait for the CIA to synthesize them in a lab or something.

Now, it's very different for liberalism. They're largely united, but it's not like Burkina Faso and the other West African countries. You can't have a cult of personality based on not having a cult of personality. STREAM ABRUPTLY ENDS

gckHTvV.png
 
Top