Marineflieger Kommando: MFK - Hitlers Fleet Air Arm

WW2 MFK Synopsis
Part Eight

A Brief Synopsis World War II Operations

The MFK were to play significant roles in Kriegsmarine operations and achieve some notable success before ultimately succumbing to defeat as part of the wider German armed forces. It would play a contributary part along with Luftwaffe aircraft in the destruction of a number of major vessels during the early years and played a key supporting role as a Luftwaffe adjunct, particularly against naval targets, when not tasked with Kreigsmarine missions. It would make major operational contributions in:
  • Invasion of Norway May 1940
  • North Sea Operations in support of the Battle of Britain 1940
  • Key contributions in the Mediterranean Theatre 1940-42 (including operations against Malta and supporting the invasion of Crete.)
  • Baltic Operations 1941-45
  • Battle of the Atlantic 1940-44, including Operation Rheinubung 1941
  • Arctic Operations 1942-43, and
  • Defense of Germany 1942-45.
At its peak its strength would be just under 80,000 personnel and operate 580 combat aircraft while maintaining two divisions equivalent of anti-air defense ground personnel. By mid-1941 with the loss of the majority of the Kreigsmarine surface fleet its ability to conduct offensive operations had largely disappeared, though its maritime patrol elements would continue to make valuable contributions in the Battle of the Atlantic and would achieve notable successes against Soviet forces in Arctic waters in 1942/43. Facing growing opposition, the MFK was involved in the defensive operations increasingly as losses and shortages, combined with the loss of carrier platforms, reduced its effectiveness. Ultimately the Allies industrial might would overwhelm the armed forces, including the MFK, and lead to the defeat of Germany.

Before the war the MFK had become responsible for Naval anti-aircraft gunnery training. With the outbreak of war, it became a natural continuation for the MFK becoming responsible for the ground-based air defense of its own land installations. As the war progressed the degree and extent of these units grew, and they become to integrated into the wider Luftwaffe air defense network. By the end of the war two of the 29 Luftwaffe Flak-divisions were essentially MFK, manned with Kreigsmarine personnel while under operational control of the Luftwaffe, predominantly tasked with airbase defense.

After 1940 the limit cap of MFK strength was largely disregarded and the MFK peak combat strength would reach 580 aircraft during 1943-44. With very few ever actually employed upon carriers, the majority MFK units would later conform to Luftwaffe unit organization. The MFK maritime reconnaissance elements of the Seeaufklärungsgruppe would play a key role in supporting U-boat operations in the war in the Atlantic based both in France and Norway in conjunction with Luftwaffe Fw200 Condor aircraft. Other MFK elements would play significant roles as Luftwaffe adjuncts in the Mediterranean, Atlantic and Arctic theatres, especially in anti-shipping tasks, and have significant roles in the defense of Germany and the Baltic in the closing stages of the war.

Notable MFK Achievements.

MFK Top Aces
By VE day in 1945 of the 107 German fighter aces with a score of over 100, a total of eight MFK fighter pilots would have achieved over 100 aerial victories, with five surviving the war. The top ace pilot being Korvettenkapitän Hans-Joachim Marseille with a score of 158 aircraft. As with Luftwaffe aces several MFK aces achieved notable high scores involved in Eastern Front operations, and several would also have significant successes in the Mediterranean and European theatres. The list of top scoring aces with over 100 victories for the MFK was.
  1. 158 Hans-Joachim Marseilles
  2. 140 Friedrich Miller (KIA 29 May 1944)
  3. 136 Karl-Heinz Webber (KIA 7 June 1944)
  4. 129 Walter Dahl
  5. 114 Werner Schnaer
  6. 112 Kurt Burhlgen
  7. 102 Seigfried Freytag (MIA 9 April 1945)
  8. 101 Ulrich Weinz
Head of the MFK Wever’s own son Walther was also a successful ace serving with the MFK from June 1943. He achieved a total of 44 victories before being shot down and killed by allied fighters on 10 April 1945.

Notable Surface Vessels sunk by MFK
A list of major surface vessels sunk by the MFK during WW2.
(Note: Asterix {*} denotes vessels sunk by joint Luftwaffe/MFK elements.)
  • HMS Effingham* Carrier Britain Norway April 40
  • HMS Surrey Cruiser Britain Scapa Flow August 40
  • HMS Suffolk Cruiser Britain Nth Atlantic April 41
  • HMS Glorious Carrier Britain Nth Atlantic April 41
  • HMS York* Cruiser Britain Crete May 41
  • HMS Fiji* Cruiser Britain Crete May 41
  • HMS Gloucester* Cruiser Britain Crete May 41
  • Marat* Battleship Russia Baltic Sept 41
  • Arkhangelsk Battleship Russia Arctic June 42 (Ex – HMS Royal Sovereign)
  • Murmansk Cruiser Russia Arctic June 42 (Ex- USS Milwaukee)
This table reflects the decline in anti-shipping operations conducted by the MFK after 1942. By late 1943 the few surviving Kreigsmarine major surface vessels had been withdrawn to the Baltic, and thereafter the MFK role was largely defensive in nature, being employed supporting Kreigsmarine Baltic operations, but largely in conjunction with the Luftwaffe in the defense of Germany. Nevertheless, despite its small size and operational constraints it was employed under, the fact remains that as an arm it was involved in the sinking of four capital ships (2 battleships and 2 carriers) and six cruisers (3 heavy and 3 light) and numerous other vessels despite these limitations. It is an indication of both the professionalism and unrealized potential that German naval aviation provided the Kreigsmarine during the opening years of WW2.

A more detailed Carrier specific synopsis (with Piccies!) will follow in the next post. Enjoy T.
 
Last edited:
At its peak its strength would be just under 80,000 personnel and operate 580 combat aircraft while maintaining two divisions equivalent of anti-air defense ground personnel. By mid-1941 with the loss of the majority of the Kreigsmarine surface fleet its ability to conduct offensive operations had largely disappeared, though its maritime patrol elements would continue to make valuable contributions in the Battle of the Atlantic and would achieve notable successes against Soviet forces in Arctic waters in 1942/43.

Before the war the MFK had become responsible for Naval anti-aircraft gunnery training. With the outbreak of war, it became a natural continuation for the MFK becoming responsible for the ground-based air defense of its own land installations. As the war progressed the degree and extent of these units grew, and they become to integrated into the wider Luftwaffe air defense network. By the end of the war two of the 29 Luftwaffe Flak-divisions were essentially MFK, manned with Kreigsmarine personnel while under operational control of the Luftwaffe, predominantly tasked with airbase defense.
I actually curious, from my very little knowledge, I know that in 1944-1945 that as the war tilted against Germany, Kriegsmarine and Luftwaffe personnel were thrown into the fray as infantry. I am not sure how well they did (though I would imagine poorly, with a huge lack of training & equipment), but does the fact that the Kriegsmarine have 1 or 2 Flak divisions at least give them a bit of training and equipment (manning those flak guns should give them experience, and they would probably use those AA in ground combat which solves a bit of the equipment problem) for the coming storm.

Edit: Just realised after I typed that flak divisions are still a last ditch effort to transform what are AA units into a combat units, so not a surprise if they absolutely mauled. What I was thinking when I typed this is what are the butterflies from having Kriegsmarine personnel integrated into the Luftwaffe flak divisions already. Will they have at least a bit more ground combat training? Will the Kriegsmarine crews have at least leaders who have a tiny bit of experience in ground warfare? Will there be power struggles regarding who controls such units ( the post did say the Luftwaffe have operational control so easy to guess who won) or will the 2 branches with the Marineflieger as a link work more and more together as the final days of the Reich draws closer (to the point that the Kriegsmarine are fine with Kriegsmarine Flak division under luftwaffe control).
 
Last edited:
MFK Flak Divisions
I actually curious, from my very little knowledge, I know that in 1944-1945 that as the war tilted against Germany, Kriegsmarine and Luftwaffe personnel were thrown into the fray as infantry. I am not sure how well they did (though I would imagine poorly, with a huge lack of training & equipment), but does the fact that the Kriegsmarine have 1 or 2 Flak divisions at least give them a bit of training and equipment (manning those flak guns should give them experience, and they would probably use those AA in ground combat which solves a bit of the equipment problem) for the coming storm.

Edit: Just realised after I typed that flak divisions are still a last ditch effort to transform what are AA units into a combat units, so not a surprise if they absolutely mauled. What I was thinking when I typed this is what are the butterflies from having Kriegsmarine personnel integrated into the Luftwaffe flak divisions already. Will they have at least a bit more ground combat training? Will the Kriegsmarine crews have at least leaders who have a tiny bit of experience in ground warfare? Will there be power struggles regarding who controls such units ( the post did say the Luftwaffe have operational control so easy to guess who won) or will the 2 branches with the Marineflieger as a link work more and more together as the final days of the Reich draws closer (to the point that the Kriegsmarine are fine with Kriegsmarine Flak division under luftwaffe control).
The logic was that the MFK having large regional bases and access to both ships and aircraft could provide basic naval AA training initially, particularly in terms of ship based and using the Range finders the ships were fitted with. I mentioned the specific training staffelen on the CVT Boelcke. this was one variety of supplementary use of that platform. Secondly it had the majority of its fixed wing aircraft operating from land bases, frequently sharing or co-located with Luftwaffe facilities. As the war turned, these became more and more subject to air attack, and a growth in the requirement of airfield defenses occurred. Being Kreigsmarine facilities, a growing number of Kreigsmarine personnel were responsible for manning and operating their own airfield defenses. But because this was integrated into the wider Luftwaffe air defense network, the natural synergies of the two services, air interception, radar etc., that despite the different origin of the two sets of personnel manning AA defense's, their employment was later as part of a larger integrated whole network, rather than stand alone for each base.

Note the term Flak division was not in Luftwaffe or Kreigsmarine terms a description of a ground fighting force, or at least not until the very end of the war. A Flak division was mostly a term describing the unified administrative control of multiple air defense assets. Such a division in fighting terms would control varying numbers of AA regiments along with ancillary units like, radar, searchlights etc., optimized into a single integrated formation tasked to provide air defense, usually to provide a higher level of command on a regional basis, and provide C&C, administration, resupply etc. It was not a tactical, ground warfare formation, though the Luftwaffe did have such, most noticeably the excellent Fallschirmjagers. Even there, the Fallschirmjager was a totally different function and body separate to the Flak division, and its employment reflected this.

On that note, Luftwaffe Flak units did frequently get involved in ground operations, but generally not intentionally. Good example would be their use by Hans Luck(?) in Normandy in his role defeating or containing Operation Goodwood. That battery would end up performing fearsome execution on British Tanks, but the guns were coincidentally sited in his location, but tasked initially in a role to provide air defense over Caen, not to provide a specific ground warfare role. ITTL the Kreigsmarine Flak divisions largely were to protect Kreigsmarine naval facilities and MFK ground bases, most particularly those bordering the Baltic.
 
Last edited:
MFK Carrier Operations during WW2 - Part 1
Part Nine

Synopsis of MFK Carrier operations during WW2
As a branch to provide the offensive arm for carrier operations the final success of the MFK was severely constrained by the fact that the Kreigsmarine would only ever succeed in deploying five in any way functional carriers to conduct combat operations in its decade of existence. Only two of these five hulls were specifically designed as aircraft carriers from the keel up, indicates the issues that impacted on naval aviation effectiveness for Germany during hostilities.

Initial Kreigsmarine plans to acquire a carrier capability were first raised in the early 1930s. Partly this was based on assumption of forming a balanced fleet and partly based on the concept that should Panzerschiffe or long-range cruisers be required to break into the Atlantic to attack British commerce, then aviation support would be essential reconnaissance and to either avoid or disrupt RN patrolling elements covering the North-Atlantic access the vital British Convoy routes.

The first Fleet carrier designs of German naval architects would run into difficulties, exposing the lack of experience in building such vessels, awareness of the realities of carrier operations in the North Sea and the lack of overall clarity in the ships' mission objectives. This lack of clarity led to elements such as medium caliber guns for surface defense that were either eliminated from, or not included in other developing foreign designs. A later MFK delegation in 1935 of officers and constructors visited Japan, obtaining flight deck equipment, blueprints, and inspection the aircraft carrier Akagi under a collaborative agreement. This would result in a design revision subsequently to her delayed sistership, the Werner Voss, but the first carrier Graf Zeppelin would be completed with several inherent design inefficiencies reflecting the initial poor grasp of carrier doctrine.

As the design process was finalized, Adolf Hitler became the Chancellor of Germany and unilaterally withdrew from the restrictions of the Treaty of Versailles and began the systematic re-building of the armed forces. The prestige brought by the Panzerschiffe and following improved P-class vessels under construction, led Hitler order two of these to be modified and completed as the battleships Scharnhorst and Gneisenau. Preceding the 1935 Anglo-German Naval Agreement, which permitted Germany to build up to 35 percent of the strength of the Royal Navy in all warship categories. Hitler had covertly already approved the commencement of the first Kreigsmarine carrier and formation of the MFK.

What followed was to disrupt the intended construction plans for the service in the pre-war period. A combination of political infighting between the Kriegsmarine and other services over resources, doctrine disputes within the Kriegsmarine itself and Adolf Hitler's lack of interest in vessels other than battleships, all conspired against carrier construction. Hitler’s approval and prioritization of battleships was more based upon symbology purposes as powerful icons of German Re-armament, rather than a utility-based fleet structure consideration. Though the first designed carrier Graf Zeppelin was started before 1937, support issues came to a head between the services which hampered work, bringing it almost to a halt and impeded further construction after this. A shortage of workers and materials slowed construction to a virtual standstill on many projects, with Hitler’s prioritizations of the Army and Luftwaffe needs impacting at this point. The result was to leave the Kreigsmarine with three large projects halted at a very advanced state (80+%) of completion. Work was only resume on these at a slower rate with the outbreak of hostilities. With subsequent events all three would eventually be completed as carriers, the Werner Voss (Graf Zeppelins modified sister ship) and the cruisers Lutzow and Seydlitz as very basic and elementary carrier conversions.

Initially with only a single available operational platform in the form of the Graf Zeppelin, its employment in isolation exposed it to the risk of being overwhelmed, which is what was to occur on its first operational deployment. The net result of this was that after the disastrous Kreigsmarine losses of the Norway campaign and Operation Rheinubung (including Graf Zeppelin) the Kreigsmarine had lost virtually all its major surface vessels. After some frantic negotiation the three partially complete hulls would be belatedly completed as carriers (two of which were very basic wooden decked conversions) after 1942, and would participate in a single major operation, Operation Silver Gull in Arctic waters. This was the part of the 1942 successful German/Finnish offensive to occupy the Kola Peninsula in northern Russia and capture Murmansk. Though a success, the exposure of the carriers to achieve this led ultimately to the loss of two of the three, Werner Voss and Seydlitz, and damage to the third Lutzow, and subsequent withdrawal of all the surviving Kreigsmarine major surface vessels to the Baltic for the remainder of the war.

In conclusion the Kreigsmarine was only to ever employ five aircraft carriers, three of them very basic conversions, and due to the circumstances of their construction and subsequent employment they were largely denied the opportunity to make any substantive contribution to the German war effort

DKM Aircraft Carriers 1934-45.jpg

The five operational carriers of the Kreigsmarine from which the MFK would operate from in WW2. (Note: Only the Graf Zeppelin and Werner Voss were designed from the Keel up in that role. The remaining three were basic austere wooden decked conversions of other hulls to operate MFK aircraft.)
 
Last edited:
MFK Carrier Operations during WW2 - Part 2
Part Ten

The Five Kreigsmarine Aircraft Carriers 1934-45

1. CVT/E Oswald Boelcke
Ironically the first Kreigsmarine carrier would be its longest serving and sole carrier to survive the war before its scrapping in 1955. Acquired to provide an aviation training platform in 1934 it was a basic conversion of the 10,000-ton merchant vessel Hansel for this role. As completed it was an unarmed diesel-powered vessel without armor and fitted with a wooden flight deck, two elevators and a catapult. Completed initially without any ordnance handling facilities or aviation fuel storage, it would later have these supplemented to a limited degree. Lacking the endurance of other small carriers, it would be adequate for operations in the confined waters of the Baltic. As the navy’s first true aircraft carrier it was not actually commissioned into the Kreigsmarine until 1935 after the signing of the Anglo-German naval treaty and be named Oswald Boelcke after the famous WW1 fighter ace.

It would be continuously employed as the Navy training carrier for the majority of its service and survive WW2. Later fitted with a light anti-aircraft armament and able to carry up to 22 aircraft it was similar to other small training carriers of this period. Due to its basic design and small air group, it operated entirely in Baltic waters. With no other navy carriers and the deteriorating situation on the Eastern Front from late 1944 onward it would be active in limited operational roles providing aircover and support as required, and be one of the remaining Kreigsmarine vessels evacuating civilians from East Prussia. Uniquely, in one of his few actions as Fuhrer after Hitler’s death, Admiral Doenitz would ‘sell’ it to Finland for 100RM two days before VE day. This ‘voluntarily sale/transfer’ would see it remain in the Finnish Navy continuing as a limited training carrier until its disposal and scrapping in 1955.

2. CV Graf Zeppelin
ship_grafzeppelin2.jpg
The Graf Zeppelin nearing completion late 1938. (Note the twin 5.9-inch medium calibre mounts that would be deleted in her following sister ship Werner Voss)
One of the two specifically designed large carriers for the navy, it was the sole operational carrier when war broke out in 1939. Despite some less-than-optimal design aspects upon completion, at 33,000tons with good speed and armor and capable of carrying 42 aircraft it represented a capable platform for its intended role. Named after Graf (Count) Ferdinand von Zeppelin, the ship was launched on 8 December 1936, and due to shifting construction priorities its completion was delayed until September 1939. Working up in the Baltic it missed the disastrous losses of the Norway campaign, and first operational deployment was its involvement in Operation Rheinubung in the North Atlantic in May 1941.

Incorporating the four Kriegsmarine large surface units available at the time, battleships Bismarck and Scharnhorst, heavy cruiser Prinz Eugen along with the Graf Zeppelin. The planned intent was to break out into the North Atlantic convoy routes causing damage and disruption to the British convoys, before returning home. The Graf Zeppelin was to accompany the force providing air cover and to engage detected RN covering forces in the Denmark Straight to assist the breakout of the other heavy units. Once this was achieved the Graf Zeppelin was to withdraw to Norway.

Unfortunately, due to signals intelligence and aerial recon, the British Admiralty was alerted, and the majority of the Home Fleet deployed to counter this operation. The resulting Battle of the Denmark Straight is well known. Though successful in sinking both the aircraft carrier Glorious and heavy cruiser Suffolk as intended, the Graf Zeppelin would be sunk by the counter strikes of the three Home Fleet Carriers concentrated to oppose the German breakout. Of the other major German surface vessels, only the Prinz Eugen would survive to return to Norway.
j29dfiaz4fd71.jpg
Photo of the last moments of the Graf Zeppelin, sinking in the battle of the Denmark Straights.
5graf.jpg
Sonar image of the surprisingly intact and upright wreck of the Graf Zeppelin on the Atlantic Ocean Floor 2016.


3. CV Werner Voss

The sister ship of the earlier Graf Zeppelin was one of the deferred Kreigsmarine construction projects of 1937. (2) Postponement enabled several earlier design issues of her earlier sister ship to be corrected and design changes incorporated when work resumed briefly in late 1939. The 5.9-in weapons and magazines where deleted, replaced by additional sponson mounted 4.1-inch guns and AA mounts. This removal enabled an enlarged and improved aviation fuel storage system and greater hangar for additional aircraft. Beyond the obvious replaced medium mounts with AA guns, other visual cues differentiated the two sister ships. A curved ‘Atlantic’ bow for improved sea keeping a longer lower bridge structure and broader funnel without cap being the obvious visual changes.
Werner Voss_2.jpg
1942 and the 85% complete hull of the Werner Voss being towed into dock to finish the delayed fitting out process.

Work would eventually resume after the failure of Operation Rheinubung late 1941. Despite several machinery issues which delayed its workup the Werner Voss was included in the planning for Operations Silver Gull, the naval portion of the attack to secure the Kola Peninsula in 1942, with other major Kreigsmarine combatants in April 1942. The concentration of this force was detected by the British, unaware of the actual operational plan and fearing a repeat of the earlier Operation Rheinubung to break out into the convoy routes of the North Atlantic, a maximum effort raid was mounted by RAF Bomber Command against the carriers and cruisers concentrated in Faettenfjord Norway. On the evening of 28/29 April 1942 some 330 Lancasters and Halifaxes of Bomber Command conducted a major attack on this anchorage.

WV wreck.jpg

The capsized hull of the Werner Voss in Faettenfjord, Norway undergoing salvage work in 1948.
Unbeknownst to the British the majority of the force had departed the prior afternoon to the raid, moving to Tromso in far northern Norway in preparation for the upcoming offensive. Unfortunately, the Werner Voss had suffered a significant engineering casualty during the move to Norway, and the resulting delay led to it remaining behind and being the sole vessel in the anchorage when raided. As such it bore the full brunt of the attack. It is assessed that it was struck by a least four 1000lb bombs and several smaller bombs causing catastrophic damage. Set on fire, flooding rapidly overwhelmed the ship and it capsized in shallow water, with the upturned hull remaining visible. (3)

The majority of the Werner Voss’s air group survived having earlier been flown off initially upon arrival. They would subsequently participate in Operation Silver Gull as part of the land-based MFK component of Luftflotte 5. They would remain in Norway and continue to operate in Arctic waters until the MFK component was withdrawn to Germany in late 1944. The wreck of Werner Voss remained in place until after the war, with salvage work lasting from 1948 until 1952.


4. CVL Lutzow. (4)

Lutzow was the last of the six P-class cruiser hulls laid down after 1930 and was the oldest of the three 1937 deferred hulls. The initial design was resource intensive and construction delays resulted after vessels four and five were enlarged and completed using Lutzow’s turrets as the Scharnhorst-class battleships. This, included with the Nazi Parties assumption of power and amended construction priorities, resulted in work halting on the Lutzow with the hull only 80% complete in 1937. Work would only resume in 1941 and was completed as a very austere and simple wooden-decked carrier capable of operating 38 aircraft in 1942. After a brief work up in the Baltic it was one of the three carriers assigned to Operation Silver Gull in April 1942.

6189319dc2c1767028e5f09733c404a7.jpg
The 80% complete Lutzow being fitted with a wooden flight deck 1942 as an austere carrier conversion.

Despite its austere layout, with its longer hull and high speed it was to prove very effective in this operation, with its air group contributing to the sinking of both major vessels of the Soviet Northern Fleet, Archangelsk and Murmansk along with other shipping in the opening phases and providing air cover for the successful occupation of the Kola Peninsula. With its objectives concluded, it and the other surface vessels involved would be withdrawn back to the Baltic in late May.

Anticipating this withdrawal the RN mounted a major operation to interdict the withdrawing vessels, concentrating over a dozen submarines in Norway waters and the North Sea, and mounting a large aerial mining campaign on the approaches to Wilhelmshaven. Despite the high transit speed and heavy escort, the British submarine HMS Spearfish attacked the ship on 29 April and scored a single serious hit. The torpedo hit the Lützow's stern quarter, blowing off one shaft and causing major flooding. Nevertheless, it was still able to proceed at over 10 knots and reached the Jade River Estuary shortly before dawn, where it struck an aerial mine causing further flooding and major damage. But for the availability of tugs and close proximity of the port then it probably would have been lost.

Due to the extent and significance of the damage the ship would remain in dockyards hands for repairs, which lasted for nearly a year. During her time in drydock and on the dockside in Kiel, Lützow was twice specifically targeted by large British bombing raids, on both occasions being hit with 500-lb GP bombs. The resultant damage added to repair delays, and it would not be until the second half of 1943 that the Lutzow was again operational.

For the remainder of her service the Lutzow would remain in the Baltic supporting naval and land force operations as the Eastern Front situation deteriorated. On 18 December 1944 Lützow was in Gotenhafen when the RAF executed a major raid targeting the port. Many ships were sunk in the harbor and a single bomb struck the very bow of the ship, but several near misses inflicted considerable underwater damage. Moved to the port of Swinemünde to receive temporary repairs. On 16 April 1945, specifically targeted by bombers from 617 ("Dambusters") squadron carrying 1000-pound bombs and the super-heavy Tallboy bomb. Three 1000-pound bombs hit the ship and of the Seven Tallboys dropped, one exploded between the ship and the shore and tore a one-by-ten-meter hole in hull, while a second penetrated right through the ship, detonating below it and breaking its back just forward of the forward hanger. The front portion broke off and sank rapidly, while the rear portion was only prevented from capsizing by her superstructure hitting the shore. Most of the lower decks were flooded but despite sinking, the water was shallow enough that her main deck was still partially above water. With Soviet forces approaching her crew rigged scuttling charges and destroyed the hull in Kaiserfahrt canal on 23 April 1945. The remnants of the ship were raised from the shallow water in September 1947 and broke her up for scrap in 1948–1949.
R.jpg
Reco. photo of the Lutzow in Moene Canal Sweenemunde, which would result in the Tallboy raid and sinking.

5. CVL Seydlitz (5)

Seydlitz was the second navy heavy cruiser of the Prinz Eugen class, but its completion was stopped in 1938 95 percent complete. The unfinished ship remained pier-side in the shipyard until 1941, when Hitler allows its completion as an aircraft carrier instead. Following Operation Rheinubung Hitler’s order to scrap incomplete vessels reflected his loss of faith in the Kreigsmarine. Only with Goring’s support was this altered for the affected vessels to be completed as aircraft carriers.

Seyd2.jpg
Photo of the 95% complete Seydlitz in dock, shortly before commencing conversion to aircraft carrier 1942.

With this, the conversion work began on Seydlitz. Despite the ship being approximately 95 percent complete, and only requiring a very short period to become fully operational by installing her anti-aircraft armament, masts, cranes, and aircraft catapult, the far slower rebuilding work to become a carrier was commenced. Hitler’s decision now required the majority of the superstructure be cut away, to prepare for the installation of a flight deck and an aircraft hangar. In total, over 2,400 tons of material from the ship was removed, replaced by an unarmoured wooden flight deck, hanger, elevators, catapults and arresting gear before the conversion was completed. The work included anti-aircraft armament, island superstructure and reworked funnel installed on the starboard side, with a tall, tubular mast on the forward end of the island, and a minimum air complement was of at least 20 aircraft. Late in the process this was reworked to allow installation of radar and to reduce topweight, a relocated shorter mast incorporated and some 4.1-inch mounts deleted. Her propulsion system, already installed remained the same, providing a very high performance, but all this additional work took time and the ship and crew only had a short workup period in the Baltic before transferring in April 1942 in preparation for the upcoming operation in northern Norway against the Soviet Union.

unnamed.jpg.46c572bd7650aafc3e0be25469aaaa54.jpg
Photo showing some of the 2,400 tons of upper works removed to facilitate the conversion.

Despite the loss of the Werner Voss before the commencement of the offensive, the result was an unqualified operational success for the new carrier arm. Using a deck park and effectively operating 28 aircraft, the Seydlitz and Lutzow air groups together have a major impact. The initial attack on Murmansk harbor would torpedo and sink the light cruiser Murmansk (ex-USN Milwaukee) two northern fleet destroyers and two icebreakers and successfully cover the Luftwaffe parachute assault at Severomorsk. This would be followed by further raids on Archangelsk sinking additional vessels including another destroyer and merchant shipping and finishing off the damaged battleship Archangelsk (ex HMS Royal Sovereign) torpedoed by U-477 when attempting to interfere with the attacks. At the end of May, with the Kola Peninsula and Murmansk occupied and all operational objective achieved, both carriers and other surface ships were withdrawn south to return to the security of the Baltic.

Unfortunately for the Kreigsmarine the RN had sufficient time to mount a major operation to intercept the returning vessels. Though avoiding air interception, a major aerial mining operation had been mounted and nearly a dozen allied submarines deployed in Norwegian waters and the North Sea to engage the withdrawing forces. These measures proved effective and despite a large escort and transiting the gap at night and high speed of 28 knots to avoid submarines, such was the concentration of forces that despite this, three of the ships would be successfully engaged in the attempted crossing on the night of 27 May 1942. Though badly damaged by torpedo attack and mining, both Lutzow and Prinz Eugen would survive and successfully reach Wilhelmshaven to undergo extended time in docks. The Seydlitz was less fortunate. The submarine HMS Triton (6) would launch a full salvo of eight torpedoes at the Seydlitz. Four of these would hit the port side, causing catastrophic damage and the Seydlitz would rapidly capsize and sink in less than 20 minutes taking nearly 900 of her crew with her. This was to mark the unfortunate end of the Kreigsmarine sole successful operational deployment of its carrier arm, and again highlighted Raeder’s pre-war prediction of heavy losses in challenging the power of the RN in the confined waters of the North Sea.

Conclusion

Constrained by the internal dynamics of the Nazi system and industrial restrictions in competition with the other services in pre-war Germany, the Kreigsmarine was never able to effectively build towards any form of desired force structure for the conflict it faced. Decisions made by Hitler in 1937-38 meant the Kreigsmarine lost the freedom to adapt and develop more effective force structures in the immediate lead up to the war. Lacking the means to project force resulted in it having no real realistic strategic role in which it could be employed beyond the European theatre. In the pre-war period, Naval aviation, carrier and submarine construction in particular lagged behind what was required, with the result that when war broke out there was little scope for its potential to be developed. Committing its sole operational carrier in Operation Rheinubung, invited the defeat in detail that occurred when the RN was able to concentrate sufficient force to overwhelm it in isolation. That this induced the Kreigsmarine to finalize several incomplete hulls as basic carriers as a result, and the relative effectiveness of employing them together on the one occasion it occurred, indicates the unrealized potential of that arm had more carriers been available earlier.

While most historians and analysts believe that it would have been unlikely for Germany to ultimately succeed in effectively targeting the British maritime trade. It is often now conjectured that multiple carriers correctly employed in support of existing surface assets in the Atlantic (particularly if in conjunction with the possible variations of Plan I, the occupation of Iceland and the Faroes), the potential existed for the Battle for the Atlantic to have been far more costly and to last longer while making far greater demands upon the RN resources than actually occurred. Even maintenance of a significant force in being in Norway would have required matching forces being retained in the home waters in Britain. Had this occurred it would have denied Britain much of the strategic freedom to release many of its major assets to other theatres as occurred from 1942 onward. Without such a buildup it is highly possibly that events in the Mediterranean and opening phases of the Pacific campaign could have developed far less favorably for the Allies than was to actually occur.

The eventual ineffectiveness of the Kreigsmarine employment in WW2 can be directly attributed to decisions made by Adolf Hitler in the lead up to War. This would highlight the failure of the Kreigsmarine to have an effective force structure for the struggle it faced, particularly carriers and submarines, that would have forced the RN and Britain to prioritize operations in home waters to a far greater degree, and ultimately achieve a greater strategic impact than that which resulted. This assessment applies to the MFK as a component part of the Kreigsmarine and is a reflection of this fundamental fact. While well-equipped and trained, the ultimate weakness of the Kreigsmarine lay in the system that developed it, and its failure to develop the force levels necessary to successfully prosecute effective naval operations against the greater capabilities of Great Britain and the Allies.

1. Ordered as Flugzeugträger A, and launched December 1938 Graf Zeppelin was incomplete in April 1940, when work on her was suspended. In May 1942, with Hitler's authorization, work resumed on the carrier. By late January 1943 Hitler had become so disenchanted with the poor performance of the Kriegsmarine surface fleet, he ordered its larger ships taken out of service and scrapped. Construction on the carrier ended in February 1943 and Graf Zeppelin languished for the next two years in various Baltic ports before being scuttled off Stettin in April 1945 ahead of the advancing Red Army.
2. IRL the sister ship was laid down as Flugzeugträger B in 1938 but work was halted on 19 September 1939 with the outbreak of hostilities. Priority now shifted to U-boat construction and the partially completed hull, still unnamed, sat rusting on its slipway until February 1940, when it was broken up and scrapped.
3. This is based on the IRL Bomber Command attacks on the battleship Tirpitz anchored in Faettenfjord on successive nights 27/28 April 1942. Due to bad weather and navigation issues the majority of the bombers were unable to locate the target and the Tirpitz escaped unscathed for the loss of seven bombers.
4. This is an amalgam of the two Kreigsmarine vessels IRL. The first Lützow was the 5th and final Admiral Hipper class heavy cruiser. was never completed. Launched in July 1939,
the vessel was still incomplete when sold to the Soviet Union in April 1940. About 80% complete when towed to Leningrad where it was renamed Petropavlovsk in September 1940. Still unfinished when Germany invaded the Soviet Union in June 1941, the ship was sunk in April 1942, and later raised in September, before being eventually broken up for scrap sometime between 1953 and 1961. With the name available the 1st Panzerschiffe Deutschland was renamed Lutzow at Hitlers direction in 1940 and narrative events reflect incidents in its career. It was torpedoed and severely damaged by HMS Spearfish in April 1940, damaged twice by air attack, and in April 1945, RAF Lancasters carrying Tallboy bombs successfully hit the ship moored in the Kaiserfahrt canal, Swinemünde. Hit or near missed the ship was so so damaged it was only prevented from capsizing by her superstructure hitting the shore. The wreck was later broken up during the 1940s.
5. The IRL Seydlitz was the 4th Admiral Hipper Class cruiser launched in January 1939. The outbreak of World War II slowed her construction and fitting-out work and by the time work stopped completely in June 1942, the ship was approximately 95 percent complete with only her anti-aircraft armament, masts, cranes, and aircraft catapult left to be installed. At this point the Kriegsmarine decided to pursue aircraft carriers over surface combatants and the Seydlitz despite its advanced state was chosen for conversion. Renamed Weser, the converted ship was to have had a complement of at least twenty aircraft. The majority of the superstructure was cut away, with the exception of the funnel, to prepare for the installation of a flight deck and an aircraft hangar. In total, some 2,400 tons of material was removed before conversion work ceased in June 1943. The incomplete, hull was seized by the Soviets in 1945 and later broken up for scrap. The conversion design as presented in part Nine of this thread is largely as IRL, but with minor modification ITTL. The tall tubular mast on the forward end of the island is shortened and relocated to take radar installation and the 4.1-in mounts reduced by one.

6. During the night of 8 April 1940, Triton encountered the German cruisers Blücher and Lützow but inexplicable missed with a full salvo of ten torpedoes fired at close range.
 

Attachments

  • j29dfiaz4fd71.jpg
    j29dfiaz4fd71.jpg
    133.3 KB · Views: 11
Last edited:
An occupation of Murmansk, is a major succes for the Germans. This deprived the Sovjets of a major supply base of the very, very much needed Western Allies. Only Persia and Siberian coast is left open for supplies
 
An occupation of Murmansk, is a major succes for the Germans. This deprived the Sovjets of a major supply base of the very, very much needed Western Allies. Only Persia and Siberian coast is left open for supplies
Totally different Eastern Front ITTL. Too much to detail here and strays way away from a MFK thread, but yes, that was the strategic intent of Silver Gull. Whole raft of butterfly effects will be in Book Two. But main event impacting the MFK here is Leningrad will fall ITTL in 1943, securing the Baltic for Germany, changes relations with the Baltic states, Finland and Scandinavia and simplifying resupply issues for the northern arc of the Eastern Front for the Heer. Makes a major divergence. T
 
Totally different Eastern Front ITTL. Too much to detail here and strays way away from a MFK thread, but yes, that was the strategic intent of Silver Gull. Whole raft of butterfly effects will be in Book Two. But main event impacting the MFK here is Leningrad will fall ITTL in 1943, securing the Baltic for Germany, changes relations with the Baltic states, Finland and Scandinavia and simplifying resupply issues for the northern arc of the Eastern Front for the Heer. Makes a major divergence. T
Corret notvto dive in to this, but it will greatly impact your nice time line of the MFK
 
Part of this is
Corret notvto dive in to this, but it will greatly impact your nice time line of the MFK
Part of this is to remember that even though it's an AU, try to conceptualize them as more than cardboard cutout copies of the original. They are professional military officers, MFK or otherwise and no one ever accused the German officer corps of not having a deft hand at the operational art. Here the Kreigsmarine planners are working a plan to support the wider Theatre objective with what resources they have, lots of issues that lead to this, but their task is an operational target, in conjunction with Finnish/Wehrmacht, ground operations, to remove the Russian convoy route as a supply line for the Soviets. Book two will shape the wider context but think of these guys as a thoroughly professional body, trying to prove the utility of their service in a time of war, despite the grievous setbacks they've experienced to date. It might be the last hurrah, but there is sound operational logic behind it as an effective use of their limited force.
 
Really interesting read - well researched, thought out and planned. Looking forward to more - thank you!
 
Part Eight
Notable Surface Vessels sunk by MFK
A list of major surface vessels sunk by the MFK during WW2.
(Note: Asterix {*} denotes vessels sunk by joint Luftwaffe/MFK elements.)
  • HMS Effingham* Carrier Britain Norway April 40
  • HMS Surrey Cruiser Britain Scapa Flow August 40
  • HMS Suffolk Cruiser Britain Nth Atlantic April 41
  • HMS Glorious Carrier Britain Nth Atlantic April 41
  • HMS York* Cruiser Britain Crete May 41
  • HMS Fiji* Cruiser Britain Crete May 41
  • HMS Gloucester* Cruiser Britain Crete May 41
  • Marat* Battleship Russia Baltic Sept 41
  • Arkhangelsk Battleship Russia Arctic June 42 (Ex – HMS Royal Sovereign)
  • Murmansk Cruiser Russia Arctic June 42 (Ex- USS Milwaukee)
This table reflects the decline in anti-shipping operations conducted by the MFK after 1942. By late 1943 the few surviving Kreigsmarine major surface vessels had been withdrawn to the Baltic, and
This lists the ships sunk by the MFK. Does it mean that it doesnt include more ships sunk of the vessels of the Kriegmarines(aka the ships & submarines)?
 
This lists the ships sunk by the MFK. Does it mean that it doesnt include more ships sunk of the vessels of the Kriegmarines(aka the ships & submarines)?
It's meant as a highlight synopsis of the MFK for the war, so with six years of conflict, certainly. but that's part of a wider narrative, far too extensive for inclusion. Much of the story will cover Raiders, auxiliaries etc. as part of the wider conflict, not to be limited to a single specific arm thread. T
 
Top